Replication material for: “Does Living in a Protected Area Reduce Resource Use and Promote Life Satisfaction? Survey Results from and Around Three Regional Nature Parks in Switzerland.”

Replication material for: “Does Living in a Protected Area Reduce Resource Use and Promote Life Satisfaction? Survey Results from and Around Three Regional Nature Parks in Switzerland.”

Authors

Thea Xenia Wiesli (Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern)
Wojtek Przepiorka (University of Utrecht)

Publication year

2023

How to cite

Wiesli TX, Przepiorka W (2023). Replication material for: Does Living in a Protected Area Reduce ResourceUse and Promote Life Satisfaction? Survey Results from and Around Three Regional Nature Parks in Switzerland, FORS - Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.25597/hsjd-w487

Publisher

FORS - Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences

Abstract

Regional nature parks in Switzerland are, for the most part, protected areas that aim to promote sustainable development and residents’ well-being. In recent years, research on regional nature parks and comparable protected areas has focused on questions regarding local populations’ acceptance of such areas, their governance, and their economic effects. However, we know surprisingly little about the impact of protected areas on environmental resource use and life satisfaction, two essential ingredients of sustainable regional development. In this study, we survey people living in and around three regional nature parks in Switzerland on their resource use and life satisfaction (gross sample n = 3358). We propose a novel measurement of resource use based on vignettes describing different lifestyles, which we validate against the carbon footprint obtained for a subsample of our respond-ents. With these indicators, using multiple regression analyses, we test several hypotheses derived from the literature on the relationship between resource use and life satisfaction in and around protected areas. Contrary to our expectations, we do not find differences in resource use or life satisfaction, or the relationship between resource use and life satisfaction, across park and non-park regions. We discuss potential explanations for our findings and their implications for nature park authorities and future study designs.

Keywords

protected areas
nature parks
life satisfaction
resource use
ecological footprint

Description of the material

Data including variables for replication of analysis, Do-File for Stata

Geolocation

Switzerland

Publication

Entry No. 5